CBTC maintenance benchmark
How to organise an upgrade to metro lines
How do metro operators organise their maintenance activities? That’s a key question when migrating from legacy systems to new Communication Based Train Control (CBTC) technology.
Société de transport de Montréal (STM) led a study to help guide their own transition. Montréal‘s metro network consists of four lines, all equipped with the same legacy signalling system. STM started a project to migrate one of the lines to CBTC, involving the replacement of interlockings, ATC and ATS. But when preparing for this, STM wanted clarification on how to maintain a CBTC system and about the best share of work between the supplier and the authority.
The purpose of this study is to better understand how other metro operators organise their maintenance activities, and if the migration from legacy systems to CBTC (and more widely to computer-based systems) involves a shift in the share of work.
Contents:
- Introduction
- Purpose of the study
- Methodology
- Abbreviations
- Survey contributors
- Glossary
- Questionnaire results
- Nature of signalling systems
- Share of work in maintenance
- Legacy systems
- Computerised systems
- Share of work in maintenance
- Conclusions
- Recommendations
- Appendix
Survey contributors
Related Resources
publication Increasing operative robustness & resilience in CBTC
publication Power purchase agreement (PPA) conditioned to energy production
publication IOT for the conditional predictive maintenance of assets
publication Secondary train detection systems: Axle counters vs Track circuits
publication Tunnel asset management
publication Man-machine interface considerations using CBTC GOA2 systems
publication IT/OT Maintenance Policies in CBTC Systems
publication Brownfield metro automations: Considerations for GOA4, GOA3 and GOA2 upgrade projects
exclusive resources